Skip to main content

[Community Question] Statistics: Probability of catching a Pokémon in an Escalation Battle

One of our user asked:

This question is inspired by the Escalation Battles in Pokémon Shuffle. There's a couple of other Pokémon-related questions on here, but they don't address this specific problem.

The way an Escalation Battle works is, the Nth time you beat it, you have an N% chance of catching the Pokemon. If you've already caught the Pokémon, you get items instead. When N=100, you're guaranteed to catch the Pokémon, but the chance of having not caught it by then must be vanishingly small.

I've competed in a few Escalation Battles, and I always seem to catch the Pokémon when 15 ≤ N ≤ 25. It's been years since I studied statistical probability at school, but this doesn't seem very intuitive to me. So I started wondering about the cumulative probability - how likely you are to have caught the Pokémon after N levels.

Is there a general formula to calculate the cumulative probability of having caught the Pokémon after N attempts? How many attempts will it take for the cumulative probability to exceed 50%?


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[Community Question] Calculus: Manifold with boundary - finding the boundary

One of our user asked: I have the manifold with boundary $M:= \lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1\geq 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace \cup\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1= 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2\leq1\rbrace$ and I need to find the boundary of this manifold. I think it is $\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^n : x_1= 0, x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace$ , the other option is that the boundary is the empty set? I think the first is right? Am I wrong?
Post a Comment
Read more

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: Are linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces always differentiable?

One of our user asked: In class we saw that every linear transformation is differentiable (since there's always a linear approximation for them) and we also saw that a differentiable function must be continuous, so it must be true that all linear operators are continuous, however, I just read that between infinite dimensional vector spaces this is not necessarily true. I would like to know where's the flaw in my reasoning (I suspect that linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces are not always differentiable).
Post a Comment
Read more