Skip to main content

[Community Question] Calculus: Logaritmic functions in terms of vector space theory

One of our user asked:

We can consider $\mathbb{R}^+$ with two operation:

+: $\mathbb{R}^+ \times \mathbb{R}^+\to \mathbb{R}^+$

that maps $(a,b)$ to $a+b:=ab$ and

$ \cdot : \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}^+$

that maps $(\lambda,a)$ to $a^\lambda$.

With respect to these operation we have that $\mathbb{R}^+$ is a vector space.

We want find an example of linear application from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^+$. We can fix $a\in \mathbb{R}^+$ and we can define

$f_a:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}^+$ such that maps every $\lambda$ to $ f_a(\lambda):=a^\lambda$.

From the rules of powers, the map $f_a$ is a linear map for every $a\in \mathbb{R}^+$.

A natural question can be if all linear maps from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^+$ are an exponential maps.

The answer is positive because for each linear map $F: \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}^+$ we have that

$F(\lambda)=F(\lambda \cdot 1)=(F(1))^\lambda=f_{F(1)}(\lambda)$

so

$F=f_{F(1)}$

We can also observe that the map $f_a$ is bijective and its inverse is the logaritmic function $log_a \mathbb{R}^+\to \mathbb{R}$ that it is linear because of logartmic rules or because it is the inverse of a linear map.

So the logaritmic maps are elements of the dual of $\mathbb{R}^+$.

A natural question can be if all non-zero functional of $\mathbb{R}^+$ must be a logaritmic function.

The answer is positive because $G\in (\mathbb{R}^+)^*/\{0\}$ is a linear map between two vector space of dimension 1 so it is bijective but $G^{-1}: \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}^+$ is a linear map so $G^{-1}=f_{G^{-1}(1)}$.

Hence $G=(f_{G^{-1}(1)})^{-1}=log_{G^{-1}(1)}$.

So the dual of $\mathbb{R}^+$ is

$ (\mathbb{R}^+)^*=\{log_a : a\in \mathbb{R}^+\}$

It is correct?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[Community Question] Calculus: Manifold with boundary - finding the boundary

One of our user asked: I have the manifold with boundary $M:= \lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1\geq 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace \cup\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1= 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2\leq1\rbrace$ and I need to find the boundary of this manifold. I think it is $\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^n : x_1= 0, x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace$ , the other option is that the boundary is the empty set? I think the first is right? Am I wrong?

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: Are linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces always differentiable?

One of our user asked: In class we saw that every linear transformation is differentiable (since there's always a linear approximation for them) and we also saw that a differentiable function must be continuous, so it must be true that all linear operators are continuous, however, I just read that between infinite dimensional vector spaces this is not necessarily true. I would like to know where's the flaw in my reasoning (I suspect that linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces are not always differentiable).

Order of elements of the Prüfer groups $\mathbb{Z}(p^{\infty})$

Let $\mathbb{Z}(p^{\infty})$ be defined by $\mathbb{Z}(p^{\infty}) = \{ \overline{a/b} \in \mathbb{Q}/ \mathbb{Z} / a,b \in \mathbb{Z}, b=p^i$ $ with$ $ i \in \mathbb{N} \}$ , I wish show that any element in $\mathbb{Z}(p^{\infty})$ has order $p^n$ with $n \in \mathbb{N}$ . i try several ways but I have not been successful, some help ?? thank you