Skip to main content

[Community Question] Calculus: Logaritmic functions in terms of vector space theory

One of our user asked:

We can consider $\mathbb{R}^+$ with two operation:

+: $\mathbb{R}^+ \times \mathbb{R}^+\to \mathbb{R}^+$

that maps $(a,b)$ to $a+b:=ab$ and

$ \cdot : \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}^+$

that maps $(\lambda,a)$ to $a^\lambda$.

With respect to these operation we have that $\mathbb{R}^+$ is a vector space.

We want find an example of linear application from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^+$. We can fix $a\in \mathbb{R}^+$ and we can define

$f_a:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}^+$ such that maps every $\lambda$ to $ f_a(\lambda):=a^\lambda$.

From the rules of powers, the map $f_a$ is a linear map for every $a\in \mathbb{R}^+$.

A natural question can be if all linear maps from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^+$ are an exponential maps.

The answer is positive because for each linear map $F: \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}^+$ we have that

$F(\lambda)=F(\lambda \cdot 1)=(F(1))^\lambda=f_{F(1)}(\lambda)$

so

$F=f_{F(1)}$

We can also observe that the map $f_a$ is bijective and its inverse is the logaritmic function $log_a \mathbb{R}^+\to \mathbb{R}$ that it is linear because of logartmic rules or because it is the inverse of a linear map.

So the logaritmic maps are elements of the dual of $\mathbb{R}^+$.

A natural question can be if all non-zero functional of $\mathbb{R}^+$ must be a logaritmic function.

The answer is positive because $G\in (\mathbb{R}^+)^*/\{0\}$ is a linear map between two vector space of dimension 1 so it is bijective but $G^{-1}: \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}^+$ is a linear map so $G^{-1}=f_{G^{-1}(1)}$.

Hence $G=(f_{G^{-1}(1)})^{-1}=log_{G^{-1}(1)}$.

So the dual of $\mathbb{R}^+$ is

$ (\mathbb{R}^+)^*=\{log_a : a\in \mathbb{R}^+\}$

It is correct?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[Community Question] Calculus: Manifold with boundary - finding the boundary

One of our user asked: I have the manifold with boundary $M:= \lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1\geq 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace \cup\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1= 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2\leq1\rbrace$ and I need to find the boundary of this manifold. I think it is $\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^n : x_1= 0, x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace$ , the other option is that the boundary is the empty set? I think the first is right? Am I wrong?

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: Are linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces always differentiable?

One of our user asked: In class we saw that every linear transformation is differentiable (since there's always a linear approximation for them) and we also saw that a differentiable function must be continuous, so it must be true that all linear operators are continuous, however, I just read that between infinite dimensional vector spaces this is not necessarily true. I would like to know where's the flaw in my reasoning (I suspect that linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces are not always differentiable).