Skip to main content

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: 3x3 matrix operations intuition help

One of our user asked:

So I understand the intuition of taking the determinant of a 2x2 matrix, but what is the intuition for taking the determinant of 3x3, matrix? It makes zero intuitive sense just looking at it. Also, when finding the inverse of a matrix, why do we need to find the cofactor matrix and the adjugate matrix and transpose the cofactor matrix, and what is the point of the checkerboard matrix with + and - signs?


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[Community Question] Calculus: Manifold with boundary - finding the boundary

One of our user asked: I have the manifold with boundary $M:= \lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1\geq 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace \cup\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1= 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2\leq1\rbrace$ and I need to find the boundary of this manifold. I think it is $\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^n : x_1= 0, x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace$ , the other option is that the boundary is the empty set? I think the first is right? Am I wrong?
Post a Comment
Read more

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: Are linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces always differentiable?

One of our user asked: In class we saw that every linear transformation is differentiable (since there's always a linear approximation for them) and we also saw that a differentiable function must be continuous, so it must be true that all linear operators are continuous, however, I just read that between infinite dimensional vector spaces this is not necessarily true. I would like to know where's the flaw in my reasoning (I suspect that linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces are not always differentiable).
Post a Comment
Read more