Skip to main content

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: A computation of a zero eigenvalue

One of our user asked:

Let $d\geq 3$. Consider the $(2d-2) \times (2d-2)$ matrix with $a_{ii} = 1$, $a_{ij} = -\frac{1}{3}$ if $|i-j|=1$ and $a_{ij} = \frac{1}{3}$ otherwise.

Prove that its smallest eigenvalue is $0$ and its multiplicity is $d-2$.

It might be helpful to decompose the matrix as $AA^T$ (as far as I know, this has to be true) but I don't know how to do this effectively either - not much experience in Cholesky factorization.

Any help appreciated!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[Community Question] Calculus: Manifold with boundary - finding the boundary

One of our user asked: I have the manifold with boundary $M:= \lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1\geq 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace \cup\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^3 : x_1= 0, x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2\leq1\rbrace$ and I need to find the boundary of this manifold. I think it is $\lbrace (x_1,x_2,x_3) \in \mathbb R^n : x_1= 0, x_2^2+x_3^2=1\rbrace$ , the other option is that the boundary is the empty set? I think the first is right? Am I wrong?

[Community Question] Linear-algebra: Are linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces always differentiable?

One of our user asked: In class we saw that every linear transformation is differentiable (since there's always a linear approximation for them) and we also saw that a differentiable function must be continuous, so it must be true that all linear operators are continuous, however, I just read that between infinite dimensional vector spaces this is not necessarily true. I would like to know where's the flaw in my reasoning (I suspect that linear transformations between infinite dimensional vector spaces are not always differentiable).